Skip to main content

Where Are The Poor Rice Farmers In The Updated PH Development Plan 2017-2022?!

Ha. On Facebook, the National Economic & Development Authority (NEDA), who directed the preparation of the Updated Philippine Development Plan 2017-2022, is asking for feedback. As a Filipino, I have downloaded the pdf, read it with the Editor In Chief in me, and these are what I have to say in summary:

(1) Vision is Excellent. “Metatag, maginhawa at panatag na buhay (strongly rooted, comfortable, and secure life for all).”

(2) Strategies are Well-Conceived: “Malasakit” (Concern for the people), “Pagbabago” (Transformation) and “Patuloy na Pag-unlad” (Continuing Progress) (English translations mine).

(3) Goal is Brilliant as well as Complete. “The Goal is to lay down the foundation for inclusive growth, a high trust and resilient society, and a globally competitive knowledge economy.”

Excellent vision, well-conceived strategies, brilliant & complete goal – yet, even at 332 digital pages, The Plan is incomplete! It’s the lack in Methodology.

I want to concentrate on the Goal, first part, “inclusive growth,” which means to me economic progress that includes the poor. Especially the poor farmers. That is to say, those who are on the poverty line and below are able to rise from their economic insufficiency to economic sustainability– mainly as fruits of their genius.

I do declare: To solve the problem of poverty, first you must resolve the cause(s). After programmatically searching those 332 pages, I found that the brains of The Updated Plan did not search for any of the causes of poverty! How can you solve a problem not knowing the root cause(s)?!

The best that the Updated Plan offers to rice farmers is this 32-word sentence about the Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund (RCEF):

The (RCEF) provides assistance to rice farmers in the form of farm machinery and equipment, high-yielding seeds, access to affordable credit, and skills training programs on farm mechanization and modern farming techniques.

Nothing on rice farmers’ emancipation from poverty!

Now then, with me being the son of a poor Ilocano farmer of Pangasinan, with the perspective of my BS Agriculture major in Ag Edu (UP '65), and with my 45 years off-and-on varied experiences as Editor In Chief of technical publications, I want to tell the NEDA people where The Updated Plan is outdated – what I know are the causes of poverty of our rice farmers, which have kept the poor that poor since the Spanish colonizers taught the islands Agriculture. I will now package them and call the result The Farmers’ Muddle:

(1)   Relatively high costs of inputs– seeds, fertilizers, pesticides

(2)   Improper use of technologies– cultivating soil and planting seedlings

(3)   Reliance on fast-cash loans– usurious paybacks

(4)   Inefficiencies in harvesting and drying– non-mechanized

(5)   Ill-timed selling of new harvests – price dictated  by merchants.

Covering all of the above, the updaters of the plan could have directed Secretary of Agriculture and very-much-experienced Servant Leader William Dar, to formulate The 21st Century PH Farm Revolution Package. That should have made one complete chapter of The Updated Plan. NEDA, if you leave the rice farmers poor, how can you sleep soundly at night?!@517

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Start Economic Recovery, Start Public & Private Partnership – End The Lockdown Now!

Is the Philippine Department of Agriculture (DA) ready to fulfill its own nationwide agricultural responsibilities once all kinds of quarantines are down? Yes, under the leadership and planning-ahead head of Secretary William Dar. Never. In my 20 years of blogging, after thousands upon thousands of short & long essays published online, I never wrote in favor of an advertisement – until now. I am looking at the Facebook ad of CitizenWatch Philippines with the headline, “Public And Private Partnership Is The Key Towards Sustainable Development” (upper image above). And the lock to open it today is to end the lockdown! CitizenWatch is saying: We call on the government to work with the private sector in creating sustainable initiatives that will fortify a future-proofed Philippines beyond this pandemic. "Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country [1] " – Charles E Weller. Today, we must love our country, all of it!  Now is the time for all goo...

07, The More The Merrier – P1B From DA Supportive Of 10 Bataan Model Farms Leading PH Agriculture

Very optimistic – and excited – was Secretary of Agriculture William Dar after visiting 2 model 1-ha farms in the villages of Daang Bago and San Simon in the town of Dinalupihan, Bataan, Friday, 19 February 2021. He said in the DA news release “Bataan Model Farms Demonstrate Future Of Philippine Agriculture” (20 February 2021): I am thrilled to have seen the progress of this rice-high-value crops diversification system evolving in the Municipality of Dinalupihan. We were here when the idea was being conceived in 2019 and now it has really started its journey, its development. As an agriculturist and a communicator for development in the last 45 years, I know: That it is all markedly historical for the Philippines. The cropping calls for rice in the wet season, and high-value crops (vegetables) in the dry season, with fertigation (fertilization via irrigation). And the technology-setup is replicated 10 times in the same municipality. (I don’t know why, but 60-year old foreign-funde...

Historical PH 1st Holy Mass: Mazaua Or Limasawa? Fr Amalla Vs Maria Serena Diokno Vs Ambeth Ocampo – And The Priest Is Right!

We Filipinos celebrate 500 years of Christianity today Wednesday, 31 March 2021, Christianity brought to pagans by Portuguese explorer Ferdinand Magellan sailing the seas for Spain. The historical question is: Where was the first Holy Mass celebrated: “Limasawa” (in Leyte) or “Mazaua” (in Butuan)? Catholic priest Fr Joesilo C Amalla has just published the book (above), An Island They Called Mazaua, that argues the island of “Mazaua” in Butuan is the “true site of first Holy Mass in the Philippines [1] ”  and not “Limasawa” in Leyte (ANN, 07 January 2021, Manila Times ). The declaration and discussion are made by Butuan-based Fr Amalla in his 644-page book. Among other things, he writes: The truth is that the prevailing state- and church-affirmation and multiple reaffirmations of the island of Limasawa as the site of that first Holy Mass have no factual, historical and geographic (bases) whatsoever nor any shred of evidentiary support from cartographic studies, navigational info...